購入者:エスクローで保護 — 配送完了を確認するまで代金は保留されます申込受付中 — Belloで作品を販売する
マガジンに戻る
July 10, 2026

Studio overhead, and why it belongs in your pricing math

Studio overhead, and why it belongs in your pricing math
このページは現在英語版のみでご利用いただけます。翻訳版は近日公開予定です。

Studio overhead, and why it belongs in your pricing math

Studio overhead, and why it belongs in your pricing math. It's a decision every working artist eventually has to make, usually without a clean formula to make it with.

The decision itself

Applying to sell on a curated marketplace is itself a signal to collectors — a platform that reviews portfolios before approving artists is implicitly vouching for a baseline of quality, which is part of what a buyer is actually paying a commission to access.

Pricing a first painting is famously hard precisely because there's no sales history to anchor against — most emerging artists underprice early work, then spend the next few years slowly correcting a number that was never really tested to begin with.

How it plays out over time

Pricing in a young marketplace tends to look erratic from the outside because it's still discovering itself — early sales set anchors that later sales either confirm or correct, and both are useful information, not noise.

Commission structure shapes pricing more than most buyers realize: an artist paying a lower platform commission can price a piece closer to what it's actually worth to them, rather than padding the number to make an aggressive cut still feel worthwhile.

Camille Rouet, working out of Paris since 2021, is one example of how this plays out in practice — 88 sold pieces and 66 collectors in, starting with work like "Nursery, Morning."